What are the two types of authorization decisions that can be made by authorizing officials?

Prepare for the Federal IT Security Professional (FITSP) Auditor Exam. Enhance your understanding with engaging questions, insightful hints, and detailed explanations. Boost your confidence and ace the test!

Multiple Choice

What are the two types of authorization decisions that can be made by authorizing officials?

Explanation:
In the context of federal IT security, the authorization process involves making decisions regarding the security posture of information systems. Authorizing officials are responsible for assessing risks and determining whether the implementation of security controls is adequate for allowing the operation of these systems. The two types of authorization decisions that can be made are often framed in terms of "Authorize" and "Deny." When an authorizing official chooses to "Authorize," it means they are granting permission for a system to operate based on an assessment that it meets the required security standards and acceptable risk levels. Conversely, a "Deny" decision indicates that the risks are too high or that security controls are insufficient, preventing the operation of the system until necessary improvements are made. The terminology in this context reflects the formal decision-making process involved in system authorization, as outlined in standards such as the Risk Management Framework (RMF) and related compliance guidelines. Thus, identifying the decision-making types as "Authorize" and "Deny" aligns well with the established practices in federal cybersecurity governance and provides clarity on the responsibilities of authorizing officials.

In the context of federal IT security, the authorization process involves making decisions regarding the security posture of information systems. Authorizing officials are responsible for assessing risks and determining whether the implementation of security controls is adequate for allowing the operation of these systems. The two types of authorization decisions that can be made are often framed in terms of "Authorize" and "Deny."

When an authorizing official chooses to "Authorize," it means they are granting permission for a system to operate based on an assessment that it meets the required security standards and acceptable risk levels. Conversely, a "Deny" decision indicates that the risks are too high or that security controls are insufficient, preventing the operation of the system until necessary improvements are made.

The terminology in this context reflects the formal decision-making process involved in system authorization, as outlined in standards such as the Risk Management Framework (RMF) and related compliance guidelines. Thus, identifying the decision-making types as "Authorize" and "Deny" aligns well with the established practices in federal cybersecurity governance and provides clarity on the responsibilities of authorizing officials.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy