Which of the following is NOT an example of actions noted in contingency plans?

Which of the following is NOT an example of actions noted in contingency plans?

• A. Equivalent information flows
• B. Graceful degradation
• C. Information system shutdown
• D. Fall back to a manual mode

Answer: (A)

In the context of contingency planning, actions are established to ensure that an organization can continue to operate during and after a disruption. These actions typically focus on maintaining service delivery, protecting data integrity, and restoring operations. Graceful degradation refers to the ability of a service to continue operating at a reduced level instead of failing completely. This is a vital aspect of contingency planning, as it allows critical functions to remain operational, albeit at a diminished capacity. Information system shutdown is also a recognized action within contingency plans, particularly for scenarios where it is necessary to safely cease operations to protect data or prevent further issues. Falling back to a manual mode is an important contingency measure for many organizations. This entails reverting to manual processes when automated systems are unavailable, ensuring some level of operational continuity. On the other hand, equivalent information flows are not specifically recognized as a typical action within contingency plans. This term does not convey a clear, actionable response to a disruption. Instead, it suggests a theoretical concept regarding data handling without outlining concrete steps for maintaining operations during a crisis. Hence, it stands out as not fitting within the typical framework of actions noted in effective contingency plans.

In the context of contingency planning, actions are established to ensure that an organization can continue to operate during and after a disruption. These actions typically focus on maintaining service delivery, protecting data integrity, and restoring operations.

Graceful degradation refers to the ability of a service to continue operating at a reduced level instead of failing completely. This is a vital aspect of contingency planning, as it allows critical functions to remain operational, albeit at a diminished capacity.

Information system shutdown is also a recognized action within contingency plans, particularly for scenarios where it is necessary to safely cease operations to protect data or prevent further issues.

Falling back to a manual mode is an important contingency measure for many organizations. This entails reverting to manual processes when automated systems are unavailable, ensuring some level of operational continuity.

On the other hand, equivalent information flows are not specifically recognized as a typical action within contingency plans. This term does not convey a clear, actionable response to a disruption. Instead, it suggests a theoretical concept regarding data handling without outlining concrete steps for maintaining operations during a crisis. Hence, it stands out as not fitting within the typical framework of actions noted in effective contingency plans.