Which of the following is a reason for adjusting a system's provisional impact level?

Which of the following is a reason for adjusting a system's provisional impact level?

• A. Compliance Audits
• B. System Performance Metrics
• C. Public Information Integrity
• D. User Training Requirements

Answer: (C)

Adjusting a system's provisional impact level is rooted in the need to maintain the integrity and security of information handled by that system. The correct answer, which focuses on public information integrity, highlights the critical importance of ensuring that the data managed by the system remains accurate and trustworthy. If a system handles information that, if compromised, could lead to significant damage to public trust or public safety, it necessitates a higher impact level to reflect the potential consequences of such an event. In contrast, while compliance audits, system performance metrics, and user training requirements are all relevant considerations in managing and auditing information systems, they do not specifically address the integrity of public information in the same manner as public information integrity does. Compliance audits may verify adherence to regulations but do not directly lead to an adjustment in impact levels. Similarly, system performance metrics focus on the efficiency and effectiveness of the system rather than on the sensitivity of the information it processes. User training requirements are essential for ensuring that personnel are capable of fulfilling their roles effectively but do not inherently influence the classification of impact levels regarding the data's public nature.

Adjusting a system's provisional impact level is rooted in the need to maintain the integrity and security of information handled by that system. The correct answer, which focuses on public information integrity, highlights the critical importance of ensuring that the data managed by the system remains accurate and trustworthy. If a system handles information that, if compromised, could lead to significant damage to public trust or public safety, it necessitates a higher impact level to reflect the potential consequences of such an event.

In contrast, while compliance audits, system performance metrics, and user training requirements are all relevant considerations in managing and auditing information systems, they do not specifically address the integrity of public information in the same manner as public information integrity does. Compliance audits may verify adherence to regulations but do not directly lead to an adjustment in impact levels. Similarly, system performance metrics focus on the efficiency and effectiveness of the system rather than on the sensitivity of the information it processes. User training requirements are essential for ensuring that personnel are capable of fulfilling their roles effectively but do not inherently influence the classification of impact levels regarding the data's public nature.