Which two protocols refer to the same underlying protocol in different terms?

Which two protocols refer to the same underlying protocol in different terms?

• A. SSL 3.0
• B. TLS 1.1
• C. SSL 3.1
• D. TLS 1.0

Answer: (C)

The two protocols that refer to the same underlying protocol in different terms are SSL 3.1 and TLS 1.0. SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) was an early protocol designed to secure communications over a computer network, and TLS (Transport Layer Security) is the successor to SSL. SSL 3.1 is not an official designation, but it is commonly referred to in discussion as being part of the evolution from SSL to TLS, where TLS 1.0 is effectively the formal version that succeeded SSL 3.0. In fact, TLS 1.0 started as an evolution of SSL 3.0, incorporating various improvements and updates to enhance security features. This means that while they are named differently, SSL 3.1 (in a colloquial sense) and TLS 1.0 share the same foundational security framework, making them essentially the same underlying protocol with a transition in terminology and enhancements. This technical evolution reflects a common practice in the tech field where protocols are updated and renamed to better represent their new capabilities while maintaining core functionalities.

The two protocols that refer to the same underlying protocol in different terms are SSL 3.1 and TLS 1.0. SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) was an early protocol designed to secure communications over a computer network, and TLS (Transport Layer Security) is the successor to SSL.

SSL 3.1 is not an official designation, but it is commonly referred to in discussion as being part of the evolution from SSL to TLS, where TLS 1.0 is effectively the formal version that succeeded SSL 3.0. In fact, TLS 1.0 started as an evolution of SSL 3.0, incorporating various improvements and updates to enhance security features.

This means that while they are named differently, SSL 3.1 (in a colloquial sense) and TLS 1.0 share the same foundational security framework, making them essentially the same underlying protocol with a transition in terminology and enhancements. This technical evolution reflects a common practice in the tech field where protocols are updated and renamed to better represent their new capabilities while maintaining core functionalities.